Dev Automate
Reporting that mirrors how your automation actually runs
Event dictionaries, outcome definitions, and weekly ownership for pipelines and scheduled jobs—not another vanity run counter. Practice based in Tsim Sha Tsui East.
Primary engagement
Automation Reporting Audit
A two-week review of how your pipelines, bots, and scheduled jobs are measured—and which numbers engineering can defend in a release meeting.
From HK$18,800 · 2-week engagement
Open audit details
Related engagements
Outcome mapping, workshops, and review once the reporting language is stable.
- Pipeline Outcome Mapping Define and validate the event paths that explain success, retry, and abandonment across your automation estate.
- Automation KPI Workshop A live working session that turns vague automation goals into a short list of measurable reporting metrics your team can own.
- Reporting Review Block Four weeks of scheduled reviews so automation reporting stays honest after the initial engagement.
What you actually receive
Definitions, validation, and ownership—not a promised velocity curve.
-
Reporting language you can keep
Dictionaries and naming rules sized for engineering handoff, so the next automation release does not invent twenty near-duplicates.
-
Outcomes with agreed exits
Success, retry, and abandonment windows tied to how your jobs actually finish—not a copied SLA template from another estate.
-
Optional weekly review
Review blocks return written notes on reporting changes while your team ships under real deadlines.
“We finally stopped treating retry storms as green runs. The audit forced one outcome language—and the weekly pack started matching what on-call actually saw.”